Keir Starmer is under increased pressure to prohibit social media use for individuals under 16, following the endorsement of this significant action by members of the House of Lords.

The proposal, supported by 261 votes to 150, will now be deliberated by Members of Parliament. This initiative was propelled by prominent personalities like Peter Andre and Hugh Grant, who have highlighted the risks social platforms pose to youngsters.

Advocates of an approach akin to Australia’s argue that parents are facing an insurmountable challenge. The Technology Secretary, Liz Kendall, has initiated a three-month consultation to examine the potential pros and cons of implementing such a ban.

Additionally, considerations are being given to imposing nighttime restrictions and implementing measures to deter excessive scrolling. A comprehensive report is expected to be delivered in the summer.

Former Conservative schools minister Lord Nash, a proponent of the ban, secured a victory in the upper chamber, asserting that the government’s consultation is merely a delay tactic.

Numerous voices in support of the ban emphasized the detrimental effects of prolonged social media use on teenagers, encompassing health, cognitive abilities, education, crime rates, and economic productivity.

Calls for immediate action were echoed by various figures, underscoring the urgency to safeguard children’s well-being amidst the pervasive influence of social media platforms.

Despite differing views on the potential repercussions of a blanket ban, the outcome of the vote was hailed as a pivotal step towards mitigating the adverse impact of social media on the younger generation.

Ellen Roome, an advocate for online safety following a personal tragedy, expressed satisfaction with the vote outcome, emphasizing the collective effort behind the campaign.

Notable figures, including Hugh Grant and various bereaved parents, have thrown their weight behind the ban, emphasizing the need to address the perils associated with underage social media usage.