In a lengthy address to Members of Parliament, Keir Starmer expressed astonishment that he was not informed about Peter Mandelson’s failure to pass security vetting. The Prime Minister voiced his frustration and anger at the lack of communication from Foreign Office officials, stating that he would not have appointed Lord Mandelson had he known about the security clearance issue.

Following this revelation, Starmer announced the removal of the Foreign Office’s authority to override vetting decisions and initiated a comprehensive review of the security vetting process. He emphasized the need for transparency and accountability within the government, highlighting the failure of officials to disclose crucial information to senior ministers.

Starmer faced criticism from various MPs during the session, with left-wing figures questioning the decision to appoint Lord Mandelson given his reported connections to Jeffrey Epstein. The Prime Minister acknowledged his error in appointing Mandelson and apologized to those affected by the decision.

Additionally, Starmer addressed concerns about the timing of security vetting in political appointments, clarifying that changes had been made to ensure vetting occurs before any official announcements. He also disputed the explanation provided by former Foreign Office chief Sir Olly Robbin regarding the handling of security clearance recommendations.

The debate saw intense exchanges, with MPs challenging Starmer on his decision-making process and demanding accountability for the oversight in the vetting process. Amidst the heated discussions, two MPs were ejected from the chamber for accusing Starmer of dishonesty, prompting the Speaker to intervene and restore order.